Home › wyper vs X (Twitter) Auto Cleaner: filters, background runs, platforms

wyper vs X (Twitter) Auto Cleaner: filters, background runs, platforms

X (Twitter) Auto Cleaner, also listed as CleanMyX, is a 10,000-user X cleaner with date, keyword and engagement filters that runs in the background. wyper Social Cleanup covers X, Instagram and ChatGPT and keeps you in the tab while it works. The two disagree on what a cleanup tool should be, so the comparison is short and concrete.

Social Cleanup · last reviewed 2026-09-15

The short answer

X Auto Cleaner offers date, keyword and engagement filters, background runs and a CSV backup, all of which wyper lacks except the keyword filter. wyper Social Cleanup adds Instagram and ChatGPT, runs only while you watch, with storage and activeTab permissions, and shows a live counter and confirmation. Pick Auto Cleaner for fine-grained X filtering; pick wyper for several platforms with no account handoff.

Side by side

Store figures from 15 September 2026. Auto Cleaner's features are taken from its Chrome Web Store listing; wyper's from the shipped code.

X (Twitter) Auto Cleaner / CleanMyXwyper Social Cleanup
Chrome Web Store users10,00012
Store rating3.7 of 5 (44 ratings)5.0 of 5 (4 ratings)
Deletes posts, reposts, replies, likesYesYes
Mass unfollowYesYes, followers in four modes
Keyword filterYesYes, on X posts and replies
Date filterYesNo
Engagement filterYesNo
Runs in the backgroundYes (per listing)No, the tab stays open and visible
CSV backupYes (per listing)No export, counts-only receipt
100 percent in-browserYes (per listing)Yes, permissions storage and activeTab only
InstagramNoPosts, likes, comments, followers, direct messages
ChatGPT conversationsNoYes
Free tier"Unlimited cleanup" per listing50 removals a day
PaidSee listingPro 24 USD a month, unlimited

The real difference: background or in view

Auto Cleaner's listing promises runs in the background. That is convenient: start it, switch tabs, come back to a clean profile. wyper deliberately does the opposite. The tab stays open, the overlay shows a counter per category, and a 90-second pause protects against rate limits. You see every step, and you can stop it.

Neither approach is wrong. Background runs suit someone who has decided and wants it done. In-view runs suit someone who wants to watch what a tool does to their account before trusting it, which is the audience wyper is built for.

Where Auto Cleaner wins

Filtering. Date, keyword and engagement filters together let you say "posts before 2022 with fewer than five likes that mention X". wyper can only do the keyword part. If your cleanup is that specific, Auto Cleaner is the tool, and the CSV backup means you keep a record of what went.

Where wyper wins

Breadth and restraint. The same extension cleans Instagram (including direct messages and comments) and ChatGPT conversations, and it asks for two permissions. Both tools say they run in the browser; wyper's permission list is short enough to read in one line, and there is no server that ever sees your session.

Who needs which

Who needs which: a power user pruning years of X activity by date and engagement takes Auto Cleaner. Someone who wants the run to happen unattended takes Auto Cleaner. Someone cleaning X, Instagram and ChatGPT in one sitting, or who wants to watch every deletion, takes wyper. Someone who needs a backup of content takes Auto Cleaner, because wyper keeps none.

Both tools automate the platform interface. Neither is an official X feature; both run at the account holder's own risk under the platform terms.

Questions

Is wyper an X Auto Cleaner alternative?
For bulk deletion and mass unfollow on X, yes, with the keyword filter as the shared narrowing tool. It is not a replacement if you rely on the date or engagement filters, background runs or the CSV backup, because wyper has none of these. wyper's advantage is the added Instagram and ChatGPT cleanup and the short permission list.
Which tool is safer for my account?
Both state that they run entirely in the browser. wyper asks for the storage and activeTab permissions only, keeps the tab visible during the run and pauses 90 seconds for rate-limit protection. Auto Cleaner's permissions are listed on its store page. Any automation of the X interface carries platform-terms risk for the account holder; pacing lowers it, nothing removes it.
Can wyper run in the background like Auto Cleaner?
No. wyper needs the tab open and in view, by design, so you see each category counter move and can stop the run. If unattended runs are what you want, Auto Cleaner is the closer match. The trade-off is that wyper cannot do anything to your account while you are not looking.
Does either tool keep a copy of deleted posts?
Auto Cleaner lists a CSV backup. wyper does not store content at all; after a run you can copy a receipt with counts per category, nothing more. If you may want the posts later, request your X archive from X before you start, with either tool.

One extension for X, Instagram and ChatGPT

Social Cleanup runs in your own tab with two permissions, shows a live counter and pauses for rate limits. Free for 50 removals a day.

Read on

wyper vs DeleteTweetsThe most-installed tweet deleter, compared the same way. How to mass delete tweetsThe step-by-step guide for X. Instagram mass unfollowFollower cleanup on Instagram, where Auto Cleaner does not run.